The Other SBIR Problem: Phase III Has No Money and Nobody Tells You
Phase III SBIR has no congressionally appropriated funding, and that gap quietly kills defense startups that survive Phase I and II.
S. VanceInvesting in What Matters
DARPA funding gets defense startups to TRL 6. Getting to a Program of Record costs far more than founders or investors expect.
S. VanceDefense startups copying SaaS pricing into government contracts are setting themselves up for margin collapse. Here's what actually works.
S. VanceMOSA mandates are reshaping how the Pentagon buys technology. Here's what that means for defense tech investors and the startups positioned to win.
S. VanceMulti-domain operations expose the Pentagon's deepest integration failures, and the startups solving those gaps represent some of the most overlooked defense tech investment opportunities.
S. VanceWhy transferring classified or defense-derived IP into commercial products is harder than founders think, and what investors need to verify before writing a check.
S. VanceThe Defense Innovation Unit moves faster than traditional Pentagon procurement, but most startups still misread how DIU deals actually work and where they stall.
S. VanceDefense tech startups face dilution dynamics unlike any other sector. Here's why standard VC math breaks down and what founders can do about it.
S. VanceITAR compliance isn't just a legal checkbox for defense startups. Here's what the real cost looks like across hiring, fundraising, and product decisions.
S. VanceForeign Ownership, Control, or Influence rules can quietly kill a defense startup's facility clearance. Here's what founders and investors must know before raising.
S. VanceWhy heavy reliance on a single government customer is the silent deal-killer in defense tech due diligence, and what founders can do about it.
S. VanceWhy standard seed-stage valuation methods systematically mislead defense tech investors, and what metrics actually matter before the first DoD contract.
S. VanceSecurity clearance requirements can quietly invalidate your cap table. Here's what defense startups and their investors need to understand before it's too late.
S. VanceDefense tech VCs obsess over IP and CFIUS but routinely miss supply chain security risks that can kill a portfolio company before Series B.
S. VanceThe Pentagon's kill chain is too slow for modern conflict. Here's why that bottleneck is one of the most compelling investment theses in defense tech right now.
S. VanceSkipping CFIUS review isn't a shortcut, it's a time bomb. Here's what actually happens to defense startups that get caught.
S. VanceDefense tech compliance isn't just overhead, it's a durable moat. Here's how the best startups weaponize regulatory burden to lock out competitors.
S. VanceQuantum sensing is quietly outpacing quantum computing as a near-term defense bet. Here's why investors are still sleeping on it.
S. VanceDefense tech founders and investors fixate on IPOs, but the real exit math in this sector looks very different. Here's what the data and experience actually say.
S. VanceAllied nation co-investment in U.S. defense tech startups offers real capital and market access, but the CFIUS exposure and export control risks can quietly kill a deal.
S. VanceClassified contracts feel like validation, but for early-stage defense startups, they can quietly strangle the company before it ever scales.
S. VanceThe Valley of Death isn't a funding gap, it's a sequencing problem. Here's what it actually costs defense tech startups to cross it.
S. VanceA practical guide to defense contracting vehicles, OTAs, SBIRs, and BAAs, and how founders should think about each one strategically.
S. VanceDeep tech hardware startups waste millions on premature scaling due to flawed validation approaches that ignore physical constraints.
S. VanceWhy traditional tech recruiting strategies don't work for defense startups and what actually does.
S. VanceWhy traditional product-market fit theory breaks down in defense tech and what successful startups do instead.
S. VanceDefense software failures aren't about technology, they're about incentive misalignment between contractors, buyers, and users.
S. VanceWhy dual-use tech companies dominate defense venture returns and how to spot the real winners from the pretenders.
S. VanceDefense contractors make poor strategic investors for startups despite deep pockets, here's why and what founders should prioritize instead.
S. VanceSBIR grants fund early R&D. Venture capital funds scale. The gap between them is where defense tech startups go to die.
S. VanceThe venture capital playbook optimized for SaaS does not work in defense. Firms that do not adapt keep losing money or missing opportunities.
S. Vance